BOW & CS: Final reflection post

I am signing off from both BOW and CS in anticipation of beginning the final module, Sustaining Your Practice (SYP). The project I have submitted is, I hope, a lively object that will continue to develop throughout SYP and perhaps beyond – the underlying inquiry is likely to, certainly.

I am aware that my BOW why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers is plagued with an internal tension between my/its desire to explore a Donna Haraway-like-‘compost’-reality for an audience that ‘sees’ in a universe still dominated by a Cartesian subjectivity (albeit one in crisis). And that dichotomy means it might well fall flat on its face. I hope it manages to avoid such a fate.

It’s worth listing some immediate ideas that I intend to explore in SYP.

  • I want to take a look at the printed publication slightly differently – now that the writing is secure, I think it is worth seeing what the printed version might look like without any fragmented text on image pages. However, I think the ePublication should continue with the text-fragments as the monologue would not work there. This further differentiates the two versions. The fact the book exists in two different states is integral to the project.
  • I would like to go back and make sure I have picked up all the valuable statements made by the app. The central text in the printed version has room for (perhaps significant) development.
  • I have experimented with vocalising the app’s text myself – I have to admit, my attempts are at the moment truly crap, and I am very happy to put that aside as something tried and best forgotten. I also recorded the app’s text being read by a seeing AI app which reads things out for people whose eyesight is compromised – which was less crap, but a bit hackneyed nevertheless, and so not worth (in my mind) pursuing (although maybe audio descriptions of the images are worth looking at). However, there were some moments where the seeing/reading app went quite, quite wrong, and I am very interested in those fragments.
  • I suspect there are more photographs to be made. I will revisit certain images and look at making a selection of mini series’ to include in a longer edit.
  • I am really not sure about the moving image element – if I end up organising an online/offline exhibition, it may be something to develop again. I like the idea of having moving-image as another fractal-ed version but it has to be right. And as positive as some were about what I’ve concocted now, I just don’t believe it is at the moment.

That’s it for these modules. Can’t quite believe I’ve almost reached the end of this degree, which I began thinking I’d only do one module…

SYP available here.

6 thoughts on “BOW & CS: Final reflection post

  1. I’ve enjoyed following the development of your concept and gained much from observing the way in which you have worked on it over and over again until it has become such a polished piece of work.
    wishing you much success.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Michael Millmore Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.