BOW: First attempt – Assignment 2 (or A1.2) – draft, ditched.

THIS WAS THE DRAFT FOR A2 BUT IN THE END, I DECIDED TO SUBMIT QUITE A DIFFERENTLY REALISED PROJECT – ALTHOUGH USING THE SAME MATERIAL AND SO HAVE LEFT THIS UNFINISHED AS A RECORD OF MY PROCESS

Spend some time reviewing your personal reflection and your tutor feedback. Develop a series of carefully considered images that moves your idea forward. Hand in this series to your tutor together with a new reflective commentary setting out where you plan to go from here.

After discussing my plans with Ruth, I decided to submit new work rather than developing the first assignment any further. However, it has many of the same qualities/tropes, and moves my practice forward, i.e. exploring versions of collaboration, working with archival images and text, and moving-image collage.

Quotes below were not included in the final work but the work circles around these ideas and if I pull together a booklet for assessment, they wouldn’t be out of place.


“It is hard to imagine [] considering the inherent silliness, cruelty and superstition of the human race, how it has contrived to last as long as it has. The witch-hunting, the torturing, the gullibility, the massacres, the intolerance, the wild futility of human behaviour over the centuries is hardly credible.”

Noel Coward quoted in The Goodness Complex by Richard Wrangham, 2019

**

“[Quantum mechanics] does not describe things as they are: it describes how things occur and how they interact with each other… [] Reality is reduced to a relation.”

Reality is Not What it Seems by Carlo Rovelli, 2014

**

“Just as brains can do things that no single neuron can do, so social networks can do things that no single person can do.”

Connected: The Amazing Power of Social Networks by Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler, 2019

**

“There is a glut of images in the world and a stubborn obsession with holding on to them… [] Far from satisfying our need for information, the ungraspable abundance of indiscriminate data leaves us just as ignorant but much more confused .”

Pandora’s Camera by Joan Fontcuberta, 2014


The Goodness Complex by Richard Wrangham centres around the idea that human beings evolved with an ability to temper their immediate aggression, and simultaneously developed a propensity for calm, rationally-considered, pre-planned violence, for which language is needed. Humans also became hyper-co-operative across all activities, in particular with childcare and hunting/gathering, and are unlikely to have been the success they are without collaboration. Alongside that drive, there is an inherent desire to be good even when there is seemingly no payoff.

Wrangham suggests these paradoxes were facilitated by our ability to talk to and about each other, and that even when we aren’t necessarily being spoken about, there is always an unconscious awareness that we will be. Once humans were able to gossip, they could avert blame, conjure up stories and plan punishment for anyone who deviated or might be seen as a threat. Gossip, in these terms, underpins who and what we are as a species.

Wrangham’s theory sits at the centre of my contribution to this project.

Work to be included here:

About Pic London:

Workshops:

About Hal Silver:

Artists involved in the collaboration:

Resulting work:

Group Statement:

A rumour reached the village is a collective inquiry that began in a game set in an imagined community, riven with witchcraft, industry and accusation. Over three months, six artists exchanged challenges and responses, out of which common themes emerged: loops and circles, colonies and growth, architecture and language, nature and storytelling. The culminating exhibition is a settlement of images, objects, moving image and living cultures, questioning the stories and materials on which communities are built. 

Images of Group set-up and links to relevant collaborator’s work where possible:

Individual work within exhibition:

Gossip emerged from the original game via an imagined midwife and evolved over time during off-and-online conversations with the other artists/characters in the group. The result is a reflection and response to that interaction; a mixture of text and, downloaded from the Internet, appropriated still frames, moving image, and sounds from space.

There are two versions of the video. Each has the same footage and edit but the gallery version has a simple audio track of sounds from space from the Nasa website. This will be/was shown on an electronic tablet in amongst the other objects and accompanied by some text and still frames from the film captured and printed in newsprint.

A second version of the video is available on my website. There is an instruction to visit it built into the installation (assemblage.) This online edition has music from a well-known game from the eighties which was played on an early handheld device.

Research booklet:

 

Additional Context 

” The circle is timeless but also modern and hi-tech: lenses, records, cogs and clocks. Time is circular on Napoleon’s personal carriage clock, seized at Waterloo, the hands always showing the hours past as well as those to come. And perhaps space is circular too, at least in the mind of Anish Kapoor.” Cumming, L. (2016) Seeing Round Corners: The Art of the Circle review – the joy of life in the round, The Guardian [online review] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/may/29/seeing-round-corners-the-art-of-the-circle-review-turner-contemporary-margate [Accessed 13/10/2019]

Given my growing focus on Plato’s Cave and contemporary references in popular culture to similar metaphors, I thought it was interesting to see the Penguin edition uses one of Kandinsky’s image of Circles (1923) on the cover.

Penguin Plato's Cave
From Amazon, 2019, [shopping] Available at: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Republic-Penguin-Classics-Plato-ebook/dp/B009LVOFPU/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=platos+cave+kindle&qid=1570964028&sr=8-3 (Accessed: 13/10/2019)
The group talked about Bosch’s painting in one of the few meetings we had in person after one of the artists had created a plastic digital 3D print of a building she’d been photographing. I could imagine the object in the distance much like the pink and towers in the Bosch’s background, and indeed, everytime I saw a photograph it did (for me anyway) make reference to Bosch’s work.

 

Bosch central panel GoED
Central panel, Bosch’s Garden of Earthly Delights, From Sotheby’s [Article] Available at: https://www.sothebys.com/en/videos/hieronymus-bosch-the-garden-of-earthly-delights (Accessed 14/10/2019)

 

 

Exhibition talk and any educational visits:

 

 

 

 


All of the following links are available under Research & Reflection in the relevant menu item but these are probably key.

Background https://sjflevel3.photo.blog/2019/09/23/bow-1-2-background/

Influences https://sjflevel3.photo.blog/2019/09/26/bow-1-2-artistic-and-cultural-influences/

Collage & assemblage https://sjflevel3.photo.blog/2019/10/02/bow-assemblage/

 


Reflection:

 


Other possible related information:

Neurophilosopher, Patricia Churchland discusses the biological origins of empathy here. Her article includes:

“The overlap of moral virtues across cultures is striking, even though the relative ranking of the virtues may vary with a clan’s history and environment. Typically, vindictiveness and cheating are discouraged, while cooperation, modesty and courage are praised. These universal norms far predate the concept of any moralising God or written law. Instead, they are rooted in the similarity of basic human needs and our shared mechanisms for learning and problem-solving.”

And ends with:

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332490-800-deliver-us-from-evil-how-biology-not-religion-made-humans-moral/#ixzz61IBuDPya,

“Neuroscience reminds us that our social nature and cultural practices, including the ones we call morality, are products of evolution, constrained by our biological heritage. Perhaps that knowledge, of a sense of morality rooted in nothing more than our mammalian origins, makes us a little less likely to be infatuated with our own moral superiority, and more likely to cast a sceptical eye on those who peddle utopian remedies to our problems.” (2019)

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332490-800-deliver-us-from-evil-how-biology-not-religion-made-humans-moral/#ixzz61IBTQkvH

 

BOW: Assemblage

Since sending out various versions of work and receiving the feedback I have developed the overall concept and presentation further – seeing what could be ditched but also how I would bring some of the various elements I had created together into an ‘assemblage‘.

I do not much like the word assemblage but after reading it used (a great deal) in a blog by Deborah Lupton, the author of Data Selves: More-than-Human Perspectives, it seems like the correct word for the collection of images, sounds and materials I’ve gathered together. She writes:

I examine the interplay of human and nonhuman affordances associated with digital technologies – devices, software and the digital data they generate – and the agential capacities that are opened up or closed off as these things assemble. I ponder the questions of who benefits from these agential capacities, and in whose interests they operate. Here again, affective forces are central to the engagements of humans with these nonhuman things and the capacities that are generated by their gatherings. I address how human-data assemblages can generate agential capacities that empower and vitalise actors in the assemblage; but can also expose them to vulnerabilities and harms.

This approach recognises the entanglements of personal digital data assemblages with human action, reaction and understanding of the world. Personal digital data assemblages are partly comprised of information about human action, but their materialisations are also the products of human action, and these materialisations can influence future human action. While digital data assemblages are often conceptualised as immaterial, invisible and intangible, I contend that they are things that are generated in and through material devices (smartphones, computers, sensors), stored in material archives (data repositories), materialised in a range of formats that invite human sensory responses and have material effects on human bodies (documenting and having recursive effects on human flesh). (2019)

I am therefore creating an assemblage although I have not used this word.

The assemblage consists of:

  1. A video – itself a collage, a type of assemblage. While not a still collage like Höch’s were, it was made to emulate that trope, cutting up and pasting material that exists in the world. It includes audiovisual material that is available on the internet but contains signifiers of earlier technology. It will be shown on a Kindle – a handheld device.
  2. The film will also be available on my website but it will be a different version. Mostly the same apart from one or two tiny sections, but with an alternative audio track. The instruction to visit the website is printed on newsprint and is part of the assemblage.
  3. Still frames from the film which have been ‘captured’ and frozen  – in more or less the same way a photograph of life is captured and rendered a still image, using a slightly different tech/method – and printed on newsprint. These will be placed on the platform or hung from sticks.
  4. The poem printed on a tabloid page, orientated portrait. I hope this will hang above and slightly behind the kindle, perhaps alongside printed newsprints but I will need to see how this pans out when we set up. I was very influenced a long time ago by Louise Bourgious’ He Disappeared into Complete Silence. This is a book with several plates each of which consists of text and a drawing. The drawing is not an illustration. And sometimes it is hard to make the connection. But they are made to be seen together. I feel the poem and the video work this way too. Each can stand on its own but the point of the work is only brought to the fore when they are placed beside each other: A moving image piece alongside text, working with it but not illustrating. I might have read/performed the text in a video or even live. But this did not feel the right place (collaboration) for that – perhaps I might have reached a way of doing this if we’d had longer or were working in a smaller group -and it is something to consider for the longer-term, BOW-wise. 

 

DO02148-007_0
Image Louise Bourgeois He Disappeared into Complete Silence 1947 From: https://www.museoreinasofia.es/en/collection/artwork/he-disappeared-complete-silence-6

The work will exist in a ‘village’ (the platform) alongside other work made by my collaborators. The contents were influenced by their interests and the interactions I had with them. It is a reflection of them and my time with them. So my work is part of a greater assemblage, a network of creators which itself exists within a further larger assemblage – i.e. the three groups organised/curated by Pic London. That too is an assemblage which is again part of something greater. And so on = the fractal nature of existence.

Looking back, this is the pattern of my work. And now I know why. I am not focusing on one tiny aspect. I am recreating the chaos and interaction of conscious experience (not an individual, not an isolated and alienated concept, not one thing).

When I submit the assignment I will include critical information I sent to Pic London  – but here since it is relevant, I will just add a quotation I used which I have inserted into my work previously, and put at the front of my Self & Other blog:

“There is no such thing as a single human being, pure and simple unmixed with other human beings … [the self] is a composite structure … formed out of countless never-ending influences and exchanges… we are members of one another.” (Joan Riviere, 1927) It seems the assemblage whether it’s made up of flesh or tech or both and all sorts of other stuff is a description of Riviere’s statement.

Ref:

Lupton D. (2019) Excerpt from Introduction of Data Selves [online] WordPress Available from: https://simplysociology.wordpress.com/2019/09/01/excerpt-from-introduction-of-data-selves/ [Accessed 2/10/2019]

The Museo Reina Sofía (2019) He Disappeared into Complete Silence [online] User-generated content. Available from: https://www.museoreinasofia.es/en/collection/artwork/he-disappeared-complete-silence-6 [Accessed 2/10/19]

BOW 1.2: Development

A short film to be shown in a group show on a platform or in a circle which functions as a village of work made by the collective.

Latest iteration following feedback: Password Village3

Following some constructive (and helpful) feedback from the regular OCA online hangout I attend, plus some comments from Ruth in my last tutorial, I have continued to develop this film (See earlier versions below). It is half the length than it was and has a less fragmented audio track. I am thinking I will only provide the audio online and visitors must use their phones to hear it in the gallery or on a computer at home, not least of all because it will drive the invigilators completely insane if it is on the whole time. There are further reasons to do this but I will discuss that on my blog. I need to match some clips up with obvious bits in the music still, but I think this is a much more accessible idea – although still incomprehensible I’m sure to some. In an accompanying brief statement, I need to say something like the following:

An audiovisual moving image collage, which contains themes and fragments that emerged out of a conversation with 5 other artists, and took place over several months as we were researching and developing the overall inquiry into what a village might be. Images, mostly found but some original, are combined with music from a well-known computer game from the 80s which was usually played on a portable handheld device, a precursor to today’s ubiquitous mobile phone. (When I played it, aged 11 or so, my three brothers were horribly annoyed that I reached the high score and saw the prize before any of them did.)

Earlier iterations  – all same password as above. 

Version 5

Original I shared with anyone

 

Themes and topics in the next blog

Bow 1.2: Background

Since I am now going to submit some work I am doing in conjunction with a group called Pic London, or at least part of it for BOW 1.2, I need to record development and research in more detail than I have done to date.

I will be submitting work that is part of a group show titled A rumour reached the village. The project is the result of a collaborative process which took place over the summer and continues still, and is one for four groups showing work under the Pic London After School Collective strategies name at Lewisham Art House in October.

There are roughly six people in each group. Ours includes Michaela Lahat, Rowan Lear, Eva Louisa Jonas, Joshua Phillips, Christel Pilkaer Thomsen and me.

Why I submitted my work to Pic London in the first place

Before submitting for DI&C assessment I shared a newspaper element, which I eventually sent to the OCA, with OCA friends and a couple of external people for feedback. Sometimes when I share my work with people there are embarrassed silences as people don’t know what to do, where to look, or what to say. This can make it quite hard to feel OK with the work or get the sort of constructive feedback I am after. I have discussed this before and I am aware that quite often my work is hard to make sense of especially when it’s still in the early stages of being developed. Although I had received some useful feedback from my cohort about the way the paper might be construed by assessors (and a warning that I must stress the films were the main element in the submission while the paper a supporting document) I was searching for a conversation about what worked and what didn’t come across as I hoped. A good friend who is a photographer said she did not feel qualified to give me the sort of feedback that would be helpful but she felt the work was strong and urged me to submit it a call out by Pic London. (My fifteen-year-old son was in fact extremely helpful in the end.)

As an aside, my friend and I have spoken several times about where my work is heading and I have said I feel like the usual photography competitions are just not suitable places for me. And not do I want to be limited to straight photographs. I am in a constant state of flux at the moment about where my energies should be directed and what sort of work I should spending my time on. I am confused in my head and split, but not split in a clear and defined way. More a fragmented mess of a crisis way. This is probably apparent in the choices and mis-choices I am making with each discipline and how I choose to express it; commercial work photography and this other work I do for which I don’t yet have a name. I am also beginning to wonder if the commercial photography is the same as the non-commercial photography, so long as it is just photography; and the other unnamed stuff I do is not photography at all although at times it may contain images. That might sound terribly confusing   – and if it does, that’s an accurate reflection of where I am.

For Pic London, I submitted the final DI&C project, Origin of the Common-Place and Assignment 2 – Polar Interia along with the newspaper and was thrilled when it was accepted. However, having submitted that moving image work  – having so little experience in all of this – I felt that some form of video work in the same vein would be what was expected of me. Perhaps I was wrong – I am still figuring this all out.

Workshops

I actually had no idea what the resulting work would be. It took me a while to be really clear that whatever we had submitted wasn’t being shown but some new collaborative project which would emerge out of the workshops.

We were put into groups  – these were listed in the application where we had to state a preference. I went for Hal Silver who I had never heard about but that group seemed to suggest performance would be involved which sounded right for me and I was glad to be assigned to the group I wanted.

Hal Silver was made up from a group of RA photography students who wanted to explore practices beyond their narrowly photo-focused studies. I think they got together in 2010. The workshop leaders, Una Hamilton Helle, and Joshua Bilton have pages about Hal Silver on their websites but it was quite hard to pin down who or what Hal Silver was online prior to meeting them. I quite liked this slightly incognito and enigmatic air that Hal Silver projected when I tried to look him/her/it up. We were told he/she/it might not even turn up at all! So a form of performance seemed to begin before we even met or started playing together. (I do now wonder if the original members had hidden the relevant pages from their websites as none of us were able to find out much about Hal Silver by doing searches prior to the workshops beginning.)

Pic London’s description of Hal Silver’s plans:

The workshops will be experimental in nature and the focus of each session will be on collective forms of making, improvisation and group dynamics. This could take the form of games, role-play, unskilled mask and costume making, photography, video and sound recording. These process-led activities can be gathered into a final exhibition display, the form of which will be established throughout the workshop sessions. (2019)

We were given three talks from each of the leaders/groups over a period of several weeks on Saturday mornings, which were followed by workshops where the seeds of some ideas were introduced to us.

Find out more about each of the workshop leaders and focus on Pic London’s website.

As the work has not yet opened and is still in progress, I will either need to wait to publish any further information or publish privately (more likely the latter as I need to ensure there is enough material available for Ruth/assessors to see my process.)

Bow: A1.1 & A1.2 Reflection/pre Tutorial feedback

I have had some feedback from Ruth for BOW A1 and have a meeting planned later today.

The BOW course is structured so that the initial assignment is reworked and split into two sections. Reworking the film is tricky for two reasons.

  1. It’s a collaboration and any editing would entail asking Emma to make time to collaborate again on the rework. I’m not sure this is viable. I cannot mess with the music without her as it would undermine the work she put in in the first place.
  2. The other issue is the central and underlying concept, which I must admit always felt somewhat contrived, revolves around the limited amount of footage of women, sans monsters and disasters, in the overall film; an irony, given it’s about visiting a planet populated by women only. In fact, eleven-minutes is probably not all that accurate. The women in the film certainly don’t appear for as long as the men. But I could have calculated a more exact time. We might also have been more robust with the concept. I suspect one reason for this failure is due to a lack of genuinely deep collaboration between Emma and me and a panicked feeling of needing to have something to show.

While the eleven-minute figure is a little tenuous, going back to start again and unravelling it all would mean starting from scratch with the same film and I just can’t see Emma having the time or inclination.

One of Ruth’s suggestions in her feedback is to shorten the film; “Overall sense of the film: it could be much shorter and thereby allow the viewer to be swept up in the whirl of the imagery and music but not start figuring out what is going on.  The length somewhat detracts from the open-endedness of the film, and suggests a potential narrative.” (2019)

I agree with Ruth  – but I also feel that work is done – for better or worse and it was a useful exercise from which I learned a great deal.

I have since worked on a subsequent film, also the result of a collaboration  – and the things I learned while producing Sirens have been applied in this new project, and Ruth’s advice about length, avoiding fixed and typical narratives, rhythms, etc are all constantly whirling around in my head. It feels, therefore, a far better use of time to submit this second film for A1.2

Another reason for doing this is to keep both these early experiments as far away from the end result of BOW as possible. Both will inform where I venture next, but neither is yet in the vicinity of where I hope to arrive (no idea where that may be either).

  1. Pic London Project

What I will suggest is submitting the collaborative work I’ve produced for the Pic London project I’ve been involved with rather than a reworking of Sirens.

I am in a group who worked with Hal Silver (I’ll explain who that is if/when I submit this work in a more expansive blog). However, the group working together consist of six early-career artists/students recently graduated, or in their final year.

Here is a draft text about the collaborative project (written collectively):

A collective inquiry that began in a game set in an imaginary village, riven with rumours of witchcraft and industry. Over three months, six artists exchanged challenges and responses, out of which common themes emerged: loops and circles, colonies and growth, architecture and language, nature and storytelling. The exhibition is a settlement of images, objects, installations, moving image and living bacterial cultures, questioning what it means to form a community and, furthermore, emphasises the stories and concepts the community is built on.

Each artist will contribute work which they made in response –  joining in greater or lesser degrees with other members of the group. The work will be shown in/on a circular three-dimensional ‘set’.

The main element I have contributed is a film – work in progress.

Password Village3

The film is a representation of feelings, words, and phrases which I arrived at after having conversations, reading responses, noticing mine – with or related to the group both off and online. These words prompted me to look for certain clips/footage.

Collective

Rumour

Gossip

Execution

Village

Publican

Fire

Isolating

Darkness

Yeast

Network

Growth

Contagion/Hyperdyadic

Fiore – Flower – Berlusconi the Goat

That Goddam Enlightenment

Suicide

Small – Big

Particles

Language

The impossibility of

Walls

War

Civilisation

Pink dᴉuʞ

Garden

(Of)

Earthly Delight(s)

Community

Loss

Circle

Here are images which I took myself (in no particular sequence). Some of these but not all are in the film. They were taken in the village I spent the summer in. 

Rumour(c)SJField2019-7277Rumour(c)SJField2019-6979Rumour(c)SJField2019-6958Rumour(c)SJField2019-6939Rumour(c)SJField2019-6730Rumour(c)SJField2019-6535Rumour(c)SJField2019-6531

A sketch by artist/recent graduate Christel Pilkaerthomsen illustrating how we plan to show the work

70908895_389869788575594_3679266691688169472_n-01

2. Section 2 (Bits I made while thinking/preparing but which I don’t think fit, but including here to demonstrate development)

Here is a poem I wrote while living in a village over the summer and was prompted by my research and development for this project –  I shared it with the group to be included in an accompanying book, however, I just don’t think it fits any more with the work – perhaps/we will see.

On the edge of the village

 

On the edge of the village, too far for the water to reach

two mummies lay on plastic sun loungers,

hoping and waiting for a glimpse of death in the sky. It was dark,

but the moon was full and high.

 

“When I was little, you told me the stars were dead people,” said the younger mummy, accusingly. Then excitedly, “There’s one! Did you see it?” Death lights up for a microsecond.

 

Don’t blink.

 

The older mummy missed it.

“I thought the sky was filled with ghosts looking down at me.”

 

On the edge of the village, beyond the reach of the bin men,

the mummies remember Fiore who lived in the barn below,

a second home for the summer months. His main

house was in the village square. But he was rarely there.

 

“When Fiore died, who inherited everything?” the younger mummy asked.

Long ago cancer killed his wife, then his daughter did it to herself. “And another!”  Ephemeral, mortal, gone.

 

Never put bricks in your eyes.

 

The younger mummy smiled.

“I think it must have been the housekeeper. She and Fiore were close.”

 

Far from the men who grabbed the older mummy or the women

who took against her after her own husband died,

they lay there and waited for death to arrive. Too much light

makes it difficult to see though.

 

“Why wouldn’t he eat Berlusconi, his badly behaved goat?” wondered the younger mummy. Then she sat up and cried, “Look! That one lasted forever.” The planet’s demise was fantastic so the mummy made a wish.

 

Listen instead.

Both mummies lay still.

“I think it was because he loved him,” thought the older mummy. Though she kept quiet.

Some images that might have worked with that text. (In no particular order) At the moment, they are not included in the project anywhere but I could print and place on the circular platform. 

IMG_6846.jpgIMG_6848.jpgIMG_6859.jpg

IMG_6844.jpg

 

A collective Instagram Account where each of us was able to post images, research, and ideas.

https://www.instagram.com/arumourreachedthevillage/