Bow: A1.1 & A1.2 Reflection/pre Tutorial feedback

I have had some feedback from Ruth for BOW A1 and have a meeting planned later today.

The BOW course is structured so that the initial assignment is reworked and split into two sections. Reworking the film is tricky for two reasons.

  1. It’s a collaboration and any editing would entail asking Emma to make time to collaborate again on the rework. I’m not sure this is viable. I cannot mess with the music without her as it would undermine the work she put in in the first place.
  2. The other issue is the central and underlying concept, which I must admit always felt somewhat contrived, revolves around the limited amount of footage of women, sans monsters and disasters, in the overall film; an irony, given it’s about visiting a planet populated by women only. In fact, eleven-minutes is probably not all that accurate. The women in the film certainly don’t appear for as long as the men. But I could have calculated a more exact time. We might also have been more robust with the concept. I suspect one reason for this failure is due to a lack of genuinely deep collaboration between Emma and me and a panicked feeling of needing to have something to show.

While the eleven-minute figure is a little tenuous, going back to start again and unravelling it all would mean starting from scratch with the same film and I just can’t see Emma having the time or inclination.

One of Ruth’s suggestions in her feedback is to shorten the film; “Overall sense of the film: it could be much shorter and thereby allow the viewer to be swept up in the whirl of the imagery and music but not start figuring out what is going on.  The length somewhat detracts from the open-endedness of the film, and suggests a potential narrative.” (2019)

I agree with Ruth  – but I also feel that work is done – for better or worse and it was a useful exercise from which I learned a great deal.

I have since worked on a subsequent film, also the result of a collaboration  – and the things I learned while producing Sirens have been applied in this new project, and Ruth’s advice about length, avoiding fixed and typical narratives, rhythms, etc are all constantly whirling around in my head. It feels, therefore, a far better use of time to submit this second film for A1.2

Another reason for doing this is to keep both these early experiments as far away from the end result of BOW as possible. Both will inform where I venture next, but neither is yet in the vicinity of where I hope to arrive (no idea where that may be either).

  1. Pic London Project

What I will suggest is submitting the collaborative work I’ve produced for the Pic London project I’ve been involved with rather than a reworking of Sirens.

I am in a group who worked with Hal Silver (I’ll explain who that is if/when I submit this work in a more expansive blog). However, the group working together consist of six early-career artists/students recently graduated, or in their final year.

Here is a draft text about the collaborative project (written collectively):

A collective inquiry that began in a game set in an imaginary village, riven with rumours of witchcraft and industry. Over three months, six artists exchanged challenges and responses, out of which common themes emerged: loops and circles, colonies and growth, architecture and language, nature and storytelling. The exhibition is a settlement of images, objects, installations, moving image and living bacterial cultures, questioning what it means to form a community and, furthermore, emphasises the stories and concepts the community is built on.

Each artist will contribute work which they made in response –  joining in greater or lesser degrees with other members of the group. The work will be shown in/on a circular three-dimensional ‘set’.

The main element I have contributed is a film – work in progress.

Password Village3

The film is a representation of feelings, words, and phrases which I arrived at after having conversations, reading responses, noticing mine – with or related to the group both off and online. These words prompted me to look for certain clips/footage.

Collective

Rumour

Gossip

Execution

Village

Publican

Fire

Isolating

Darkness

Yeast

Network

Growth

Contagion/Hyperdyadic

Fiore – Flower – Berlusconi the Goat

That Goddam Enlightenment

Suicide

Small – Big

Particles

Language

The impossibility of

Walls

War

Civilisation

Pink dᴉuʞ

Garden

(Of)

Earthly Delight(s)

Community

Loss

Circle

Here are images which I took myself (in no particular sequence). Some of these but not all are in the film. They were taken in the village I spent the summer in. 

Rumour(c)SJField2019-7277Rumour(c)SJField2019-6979Rumour(c)SJField2019-6958Rumour(c)SJField2019-6939Rumour(c)SJField2019-6730Rumour(c)SJField2019-6535Rumour(c)SJField2019-6531

A sketch by artist/recent graduate Christel Pilkaerthomsen illustrating how we plan to show the work

70908895_389869788575594_3679266691688169472_n-01

2. Section 2 (Bits I made while thinking/preparing but which I don’t think fit, but including here to demonstrate development)

Here is a poem I wrote while living in a village over the summer and was prompted by my research and development for this project –  I shared it with the group to be included in an accompanying book, however, I just don’t think it fits any more with the work – perhaps/we will see.

On the edge of the village

 

On the edge of the village, too far for the water to reach

two mummies lay on plastic sun loungers,

hoping and waiting for a glimpse of death in the sky. It was dark,

but the moon was full and high.

 

“When I was little, you told me the stars were dead people,” said the younger mummy, accusingly. Then excitedly, “There’s one! Did you see it?” Death lights up for a microsecond.

 

Don’t blink.

 

The older mummy missed it.

“I thought the sky was filled with ghosts looking down at me.”

 

On the edge of the village, beyond the reach of the bin men,

the mummies remember Fiore who lived in the barn below,

a second home for the summer months. His main

house was in the village square. But he was rarely there.

 

“When Fiore died, who inherited everything?” the younger mummy asked.

Long ago cancer killed his wife, then his daughter did it to herself. “And another!”  Ephemeral, mortal, gone.

 

Never put bricks in your eyes.

 

The younger mummy smiled.

“I think it must have been the housekeeper. She and Fiore were close.”

 

Far from the men who grabbed the older mummy or the women

who took against her after her own husband died,

they lay there and waited for death to arrive. Too much light

makes it difficult to see though.

 

“Why wouldn’t he eat Berlusconi, his badly behaved goat?” wondered the younger mummy. Then she sat up and cried, “Look! That one lasted forever.” The planet’s demise was fantastic so the mummy made a wish.

 

Listen instead.

Both mummies lay still.

“I think it was because he loved him,” thought the older mummy. Though she kept quiet.

Some images that might have worked with that text. (In no particular order) At the moment, they are not included in the project anywhere but I could print and place on the circular platform. 

IMG_6846.jpgIMG_6848.jpgIMG_6859.jpg

IMG_6844.jpg

 

A collective Instagram Account where each of us was able to post images, research, and ideas.

https://www.instagram.com/arumourreachedthevillage/

 

Hangout: 18th September

After an absence over the summer from the regular hangout I attend, I was pleased to catch up with everyone again yesterday. And to hear and see how others’ work had developed in the months since I was last able to join.

Everyone enjoyed seeing Rob’s latest iteration of his contemplation on memory loss and aging. I had quoted the final lines of Phillip Larkin’s Dockery and Son to him  – a poem I studied at A’level which has really stayed with me – lines which state the inevitable is coming whatever we feel about it. I had this feeling from Rob’s work that although death and aging are what we all face, it makes things like beauty, joy and love/relationships possible. And so, there is a melancholic acceptance, a making-of peace with the fact that time cannot be turned back or stopped, and bodily entropy unavoidable, which we all appreciated.

We also discussed Mel’s project dilemmas and made suggestions, plus asked Selena about her exhibition which has gone very well. It has given Selena the confidence to repeat the process again one day. These items were useful, especially in relation to SYP.

Updated site www.sarahjanefield.com

I recently updated of my sites and various OCA students and friends have been brilliant about giving me feedback and checking typos and making suggestions. I have switched platforms to one that is better and less expensive than my last. Previously the templates available were limiting and inflexible, plus you couldn’t add video. Since audio-visual has become so important to me lately I felt it was necessary to address, even though I was a bit daunted by the task. However, it was not as painful as I imagined and I’m very pleased to have ticked it off my To-do list.

Screen Shot 2019-09-19 at 12.59.03

I was also grateful for the useful feedback from the hangout members about structuring the menu system. The menu system was originally broken down into genres but everyone felt this was too complex for visitors. Something simpler was needed. So for now, I have two main menu options, 1) Experimental in which moving image and collage/found/archive material live and 2)Documentary which includes obvious examples plus personal narratives  – also documentation –  but I am not sure about this heading. I want to group things as it makes it easier to navigate and is more palatable for visitors but I don’t think I have found the right nomenclature just yet.

We also briefly touched on what a website’s purpose might be. I feel I am giving a lot a way on my site at the moment but that’s because I need to at this time in my career. But it seems necessary for me right now, and so the site might be seen as a depository/archive where someone is able to visit and witness my development. I am after all still a student. I might not, however, include the pub work in a little while, as suggested by Allen – it’s easy to hide and I can show it to individuals if necessary – but perhaps only once I’ve added more projects. These are topics that it would be useful to chat over with someone more experienced, however, the group was really helpful and I’m going to leave things as they are for the moment.

Saying that there are three pieces of work I may add in the weeks and months to come, Sirens, a short series of still images from the Summer, and the Pic London film which is what I’ve contributed to the group show. I may readdress things once I’ve put those up and spoken with a few more people.   I also now need to bring my commercial site up to scratch and I’m having a think about how/where etc.

I am looking forward to the next feedback talk and will send the Pic London work to everyone shortly. I need to discuss with my tutor but rather than redoing Sirens (for reasons I’ll explain elsewhere, I think it would be better to show how I have taken Ruth’s suggestions and applied them in the next project. Again – all to be discussed in the relevant blog.

CS A1: Feedback

Normally to be written by the student, and endorsed by the tutor with additions/amendments in red.

Full report here: Field CS 1 Tutorial Report

Key points

This is a good and ambitious essay. I can see what you are trying to achieve in your writing – and practice. Tease out your idea a little more so that you give yourself space to explore structuralism/post-structuralism in relation to photography and to film – and to why both have become so central within art discourse – esp. as it make no sense to talk about the original photo or film. My suggestion would be to begin to look at montage/bricolage in relation to Modernism and structuralism/post-structuralism in relation to Postmodernism. The question of ‘the author’, sole and sovereign is also interesting in relation to your interest in collaborative work. (Theories of authorship are also put under strain by technological developments).

It was also clear in our tutorial that you want to look at anthropology and visual anthropology has in recent years contributed considerably to the understanding of both photography and film, so this may prove fruitful for further research.

Lastly, set a date for the next assignment submission as it will help keep you on track. There is nothing like a deadline…

  • Look at key concepts contained within essay such structuralism and/or poststructuralism, montage, death of the author in greater depth.
  • Explore why structuralism and/or poststructuralism have become so important to photography/film
  • Explore montage/bricolage in relation to Modernism

Summary of tutorial discussion

This is an edited version of notes on my blog (see Tutor Feedback in menu system under relevant Assignment section for more detail.).

Written feedback

Tease out terms such as simulation and simulacra, structuralism and/or poststructuralism, Modernism/Post Modernism and keep relating to your practice. Give more space to these, aiming eventually to focus in. Having looked at early chapters of David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity – today the concern is with fluidity and malleability within language, underpinning reality and construction of it, compared to the Industrial resolution where, it seems, existence manifested itself in a more articulated manner.

Bring alternative thoughts into writing, i.e. “technology continues to penetrate or dissolve barriers” – or “builds walls… access to cheap technology but bombarded with advertising – penetrating the mind while depriving viewers of an education…”

Clarify use of the word ‘real’

Aim for greater depth of analysis

Make bold claims but back up with examples of work and wider context

Tutorial learning points

Investigate and try to make sense of a new type of hyperreality alongside what seems like a the loss of reality. Explore the erosion of critical thought and of education which leads to it. Look at Screen and Screen Education from 70s and 80s re linguistics and language. NB Language is arbitrary. Meaning never is (can’t see this came from.) I think this is from Chris Weedon, Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, Blackwell 1987. Look at the area of Visual Anthropology. In relation to first person in academic writing, ensure the knowledge is situated, i.e. I think this because and due to that in relation to… etc.  – not, black is red because I say so. (See A Cyborg Manifesto by Donna J. Haraway (1985) – discussed in Kathryn Hayles)

Reading suggestions

Francois Lyotard The Postmodern Condition, 1979

Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory, Blackwell, 1983

Toril Moi Sexual Textual Politics, Routledge, 1985

Amelia Jones (Ed.), The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader, Routledge, 2003

Elizabeth Wright (Ed.), Feminism and Psychoanalysis, Routledge, 1998

Summary of Research Proposal (amended in the light of the tutorial)

Research proposal still to be developed… (discuss with newly appointed tutor)

Come up with focus for second essay – currently thinking about loss of reality/hyperreality as a focus.

 

Strengths Areas for development
Committed writing  Needs greater detailed in-depth analysis
 Relevant topics

Thoughtful research closely aligned to practice

 Deeper research
Breadth of approach

Ambitious topic

Further exploration of theories presented, particularly Modernism/Postmodernism and the importance of film and photography in these theories
   

 

 

Any other notes

 

Roberta McGrath
Next assignment due End October