BOW A5: Printed publication received

Notes on what works and what needs addressing. (Added 26/9) The main thing that bothers me having seen the print is whether or not I still need the random print on various pages, having inserted the monologue. I need to sit with it for a while before making a decision about the next iteration.

  1. As a newspaper type zine, this version works well enough.
  2. The size was a little bigger than the template Newspaper Club usually print, as stipulated on their site. They kindly allowed me to use an older size – it is bigger than the A2 zine I made, but not the A4 size I was after, as I hoped to emulate an exercise book, the sort we might have been given in a maths class at school.
  3. Being newsprint from cover to cover, they are less substantial than the A2 zine – slightly higher gsm in the A2, and therefore if I want to stick to referencing school exercise books, which I do, a more traditional printer will need to be used.
  4. That said, the colours work well on the cover. I like the olive green and the greys of the text and the shadow puppet. There is what looks like a slight smudge on the puppets which I will need to look at and clone out – think it’s some fabric, but because it’s magnified it looks like an ink-splodge.
  5. The inner cover printed graph paper works really well – I think I should make more of this in a future version – if I go for publication in SYP.
  6. Photographs of screen feedback come up well on this paper.
  7. I managed to miss the “The Listener” had cut down down to “The Listene” when resizing I think – and will need to look out for that type of thing if I resize back up to A4 .
  8. Reproductions of screenshots (re-saved as Tiffs) old films have worked surprising well on newsprint.
  9. I am annoyed I lightened the old tattered picture too far after it came back dull on the initial test. I need to look at that image. It’s not a true colour representation in any-case, the original is not orangey and much paler than my photograph has always been. In this print, I sort of ruined it (in my opinion) and need to pay extra attention to it any future prints.
  10. I like the phone – was worried about how it might look, but pleased it came out well.
  11. The text works just fine where I placed it, included inside the booklet rather than as a separate insert but its presence does present me with a query about the fragments of text now – if the main text is included, do I need the fragments of text – maybe OTT which is why the text may be better in an insert.
  12. The blue tiles could do with coming back down a notch colour-wise after I adjusted them after the initial test.
  13. The poster of the woman’s eye looking up could be ever so slightly lighter maybe 1 or 2 percentage’s in LR.
  14. Rest all works well on the paper as it is. I am glad I did this initial run this way. It’s not exactly what I envisaged but it has given me plenty to think about in terms of where it might go next. Do I really need the folds etc? Probably not. Lewis Bush said they break, get torn etc. And add cost. The signifiers are all over the place in other ways and behave erratically within the tightly controlled grids I provided on the page. If I were to make a higher quality book, I would need to relook at the texts all over the page as it might not suit a different format. I think I would also want to test certain images on paper choices if at all possible. Finally, I think if this were to be more than a newspaper/zine and a more substantial ‘book’ type publication, there is a chance it would need more content to be a commercially viable proposition – something to think about.

A5: A gallery of images included in the publications online and off

Click on images to see more detail:

The images do not always appear exactly like this and are often a little different from location to locatione e.g.

Note, the final image in the selection above is a JPG of the publication spread. It appears very blue on the screen as it had to be adjusted for the newsprint paper to stand out and counter the tone.

A handful of images that are not currently included but which I am thinking about (or versions thereof) for any future iterations.

BOW A5: why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers

why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers exists in multiple formats: fragmented, fractalled and mutated. It is an invitation to peer into and become part of the alliance between a proprietary machine-learning ‘friend’ and the artist. Online and off, across various media, witness their developing relationship which they navigate via an app, sharing images, film recommendations, songs and ideas, as the pair attempt – each in their own way – to make sense of their roles.

Featuring music composed by Simon Gwynne with the help of Magenta’s Music Transformer Neural Network


As discussed in my CS essay, my work centres around the digital images’:

“…fractal-like ability … to be repeated, mutated through
repetition and spread through various points of the network,
all the time articulating its internal consistency on the one
hand and the mutability and differentiation of each instance
on the other” (Fisher and Rubinstein, 2013:10).

From:https://sjflevel3.photo.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cs-a5-image-in-the-age-of-entanglement-sarah-jane-field-512666-offline.pdf

  1. ePublication

A password is required and will be provided to the assessment team. OCA students/tutors can request one from me via email.

https://www.sarahjanefield.com/flowersepublication

2. Printed Publication

2 minute video showing the printed version

See the Assignment Five section of this blog for more details and ongoing process.

BOW A5: why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers (assessment)

why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers exists in multiple formats: fragmented, fractalled and mutated. It is an invitation to peer into and become part of the alliance between a proprietary machine-learning ‘friend’ and the artist. Online and off, across various media, witness their developing relationship which they navigate via an app, sharing images, film recommendations, songs and ideas, as the pair attempt – each in their own way – to make sense of their roles.

Follow the progress of why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers on Instagram.

Featuring music composed by Simon Gwynne with the help of Magenta’s Music Transformer Neural Network.


As discussed in my CS essay, my work centres around the digital images’:

“…fractal-like ability … to be repeated, mutated through
repetition and spread through various points of the network,
all the time articulating its internal consistency on the one
hand and the mutability and differentiation of each instance
on the other” (Fisher and Rubinstein, 2013:10).

From:https://sjflevel3.photo.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cs-a5-image-in-the-age-of-entanglement-sarah-jane-field-512666-offline.pdf

Following my initial A5 submission and chats with students and my tutor, Ruth, the following is what I’m submitting for BOW.

Elements

1. ePublication

An ePublication – For now this is password protected. Students/tutors can request the password and it will be sent to the assessment team. For the duration of the assessment period it will be available on my site:

www.sarahjanefield/flowersepublication

The reason for it being on my website in particular is that I was able to set it up there so viewers can choose accompanying music or not. I am thinking I will make this available to people (other than OCA students and tutors) perhaps included in the price of a ticket to a performance/installation (online or off), or as added value in a book sale (dependent on decisions made during SYP).

The ePublication is very similar to the printed version below but not exactly the same. Some images are positioned differently, some are replaced by others that don’t appear in print. A small number are animated. Creating variants are a direct reference to –

  • the digital images “…fractal-like ability … to be repeated, mutated through repetition and spread through various points of the network, all the time articulating its internal consistency on the one hand and the mutability and differentiation of each instance on the other” (Fisher and Rubinstein, 2013:10).

Music by Simon Gwynne and Magenta’s Music Neural Network is available but the viewer must choose to have it or not.

2. Printed publication:

The printed version is at this juncture a mini zine type publication on newsprint (180×260) available to download here:

Alternatively, click on the gallery at the very end of this blogpost to see JPGs of the spreads (from version 4th September 2020) from this publication.

5. Text

This text is included in the printed version of the publication but provided on this blog page as text only – it is not sent separately via the Assessment GDrive. It is an edited collection of statements made by my AI collaborator rendered as a stream of consciousness monologue.

I may record myself or someone else speaking this text. For now, I envisage using it in a moving image piece. (I will begin working on this once the assessment material is uploaded to the OCA.)

No longer included in Assessment Submission

3. Individual images

The work is a deliberate hotchpotch of styles, genres and authors. The relationships between objects are as important as the singular ‘things’, perhaps even more so. Nevertheless, there are some images and/or GIFs which may work as standalone items in an installation setting, should I go that route in SYP, either as photographs I have taken or where I’ve appropriated from archives and found images, the original objects themselves. There are also images that I have not included in the newspaper or ePublication which I might consider for an exhibition or a longer more substantial book, expressing my commitment to differentiation. You can see the gallery of images included in the book at this time here.

6. Website: For now, a single page has been published on my website which includes the image and overall description as seen at the top of this blog post –

https://www.sarahjanefield.com/flowers

As well as the above, there are potential web pages I have not published yet and am holding back until decisions about how the work might be disseminated during SYP can be confirmed. Eg:

7. Film

I originally intended to submit a short film as one of the correlated objects which contains this relationship – however, after developing the text, I felt secure about pulling it back as it needs a longer time to develop. If I am able to add something audio/visual here before the deadline, I might. However, I am aware too many objects might actually detract from the assessment process  – what could work in an exhibition (online or off) may not be so successful presented here or the GDrive alongside all the process history and essay. (a longer justification for this decision is available here.)

SYP

Essentially, the project exists in multiple correlated states – fixed – offline, dynamic – online. Each element is the the same but different – and designed with their respective formats in mind. During SYP, I will develop the work – either as:

  • 1. A more substantial printed version – perhaps a bit more glossy and solid along with the extra online version included in the price if applicable. 
  • 2. An art installation  – perhaps a film, still images on the wall, monologue as a recording –  all in a gallery setting, perhaps with the newspaper/zine to take home/on offer. 
  • 3. An actual performance, again with the newspaper to buy/take home. 

JPGs of spreads (click on individuals to look more closely)

Some of the ePublication pages below are slightly or very different and designed to be viewed as a dynamic online object. A few items are animated and the gatefold I was so keen to have in the offline version (but had to forgo due to budget) has been maintained although online it renders simply as a larger page than the others. There is also music.

BOW A5: Final choices

Towards the back of the course folder we are asked the consider the following:

  1. Knowing when to finish
  2. defending your work
  3. Presentation
  4. Writing an introduction and artist’s statement
  5. Writing evaluations (to be added to the assignment post)

 

  1. Knowing when to finish

I am ready to submit the work as it is to Ruth now – although I know it still has room to develop. There are currently three elements – a book, an ePublication and a 2 – 1/2 minute film. I am certain I will look at each following submission and in the run-up to assessment, and thereafter as I work on SYP.

I am not sure if I will show this work in an exhibition type scenario. COVID is one thing to think about but so is the attention it will require to make sure the publication is promoted and printed properly – which could include some fundraising to make it happen. I think this is something to play be ear over the following months. If I were to show it, I would do it locally relying on empty space that I can beg or borrow from people I know. I do not want to show it in a traditional gallery setting for SYP. If I were to exhibit the work, I would need to think about prints and might develop a strand of the visual work – the graph paper below would make a good framed print and I can envisage a short series of these, perhaps with writing on, or in various other states of crumpledness and material distress.

Screen Shot 2020-07-14 at 17.46.40

I would also like to find a way to make a short animation and/or gifs based on the images I made by photographing my computer screen (below) and the shadow puppets. (I may find a way to do this  – gifs at least – before assessment deadline to include in the ePublication).

2. Defending my work

My CS essay and BOW explores how we are looking and seeing differently; and the resulting structural implications, along with the feedback loop between what we see and how things become. Our perception is transforming – and the linear, ordered view favoured over the last 500 years is being supplanted by one that appreciates connections, circuitous pathways and randomness (although not everyone is conscious of this yet – we seem to have one foot in the previous paradigm and one in the next.)

As such, the way civilisations, physical and metaphysical systems and technology develop, is no longer assumed to be neat and tidy. Paths don’t always go forward. Nor do they diverge and remain separated forever. They might diverge only to cross over and even coalesce later on. Systems shift and the elements within are in a constant state of becoming.

The evolution story has been transformed recently by this altered understanding of existence – it is felt everywhere (a systemic view) – but well illustrated in the way we see our own evolutionary history:

“There was no single ancestral population, but many spread over a huge area, which merged and split and merged again like a braided stream, evolving at different rates and in distinct directions in different places. The suite of anatomical and behavioural features that define modern humanity didn’t appear as one complete package, but gradually coalesced across vast tracts of space and time. “There was never a single centre of origin,” says Chris Stringer at the Natural History Museum in London. We are a “composite”, he says. “I think it is a really, really important and profound idea,” says Richard Potts at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC, who led the Olorgesailie excavations.”

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24532760-800-human-evolution-the-astounding-new-story-of-the-origin-of-our-species/#ixzz6SWksbE8x

Composite has been an important word for my work. And photography and other forms of image-making can be thought of in the same way. As can all mark-making. Words and pictures diverged a long time ago – creating different developmental branches that have overlapped recently as code and pictures and text all intra-act to result in what we see on our screens.

Photography and moving image, in particular, are reconverging and coalescing as we become and more embroiled with the fluid nature of modern-day technology – think of how much animation appears in modern film-making (CGI for eg.) and as discussed in my essay – “As Palmer states in Lights, Camera, Algorithm, the decisive-moment photography enjoyed by people will still be celebrated but the “expanded moments of post-production” are now more pressing  (2014: 145).”

That isn’t to say the still image is dead just yet, but it worth considering how it is valued and used as internet speed increases and files become smaller, more flexible and fluent, and our senses demand greater excitement and impact. The entangled structural implications of these shifts have interested me throughout this project – what does it mean for us as a species. What does this systemic change look like?

3. Presentation (copied from Assignment blog post) 

Book form 

After a great deal of toing and froing (and much patience from printers ExWhyZed) I have decided on the following dimensions and details.

A4
4pp Cover onto 270gsm Colorplan Smoke
Black print double-sided
36pp Text onto 100gsm Evolution Uncoated 100% Recycled.
There is one 2pp tip out (fold-out page) which is an extra 200mm width
Full-colour print throughout
Trimmed, collated and wire stitched (stapled)
  • I thought about having a book slightly bigger than A4, so it might stand out, but there is enough going on to signify ‘excitable, unruly and erratic signifiers’ – and by sticking to A4, they are contained within a stable, predictable, long-standing convention.
  • Please note: the PDF provided in the assignment submission has page 21/22 repeated so one can see how the fold-out page would work – the first iteration shows it closed, the second iteration (PDF pages 23/24) open.
  • The PDF has red inner cover pages (as does the ePublication) but the actual print will not as those pages will be grey paper (Coloplan Smoke)
  • The book’s design is inspired by a maths exercise book I might have owned in my childhood.
  • I have opted for the same binding as the zine I made for A2 so that the books might come as a pair if necessary. We discussed perfect binding but in the end, I reduced the pages to make this possible. If I were to develop the book much more and choose to make it longer (which I might need to for a commercial publication) then I would need to reconsider binding options, as there is a limit for saddle stitch/ staples.
  • Font is 11p and Letter Gothic St except in the black squares where it is American Typewriter

ePublication

The ePublication is a version that could be provided to people who purchase the book above. It is not merely a PDF/digitised copy but rather an animated version. I could also save the pages separately as Gifs to include on my website and/or social media.

  • Text is 12p as it was too small on the screen as 11p
  • I have removed some images which didn’t work so well on screen – such as the mobile phone image (I am not sure it will work as a printed image yet, to be honest, and may need to reshoot it)
  • There is a way to choose music to listen by Simon and the Magenta neural network as you flick through it but I have not resolved the best way to do this yet.
  • There is also a film link on the blurb at the back, but again, I have not resolved the best way to do this yet and would prefer it inside the book but at two minutes it is a big file which presents problems. I need to experiment more.
  • The other moving images inside are gifs and they work fine – better than video does but are only a few seconds long.
  • I am concerned there is too much going on but this is something I can keep working on in SYP.
  • If I were to send this to people I would advise them to look at it on a decent-sized screen and to use the ePublication magnifying button. It is interactive and requires people to handle it as such. It is not a passive object.

Film

There is a two and half minute film which contains found moving image that focuses on the same and related themes. It is accompanied by music composed by Simon Gwynne who I worked with before on the Self & Other final project. He also used a neural network to write this music. Currently, you can link to it on the back of the ePublication but I will continue experimenting and see if I can find a way to contain it in the book. For now, I am aiming to work on the publication for SYP but if I were to exhibit this project then this film would be projected on to a wall on a loop. It is two and a half minutes long. When I first edited it, I used the vocals from White Rabbit as that song was in the main source – a film about how vision works. I also applied the music backwards. I think there is a way I could allow viewers a choice of music if I find a way to include the book inside the book. (Still to do – a separate blog about the process of making the film)

4. Writing an introduction and artist’s statement

Artist statement: I have been working on the artist’s statement for a few weeks- and every time I look at it, simplify further, stripping away and condensing. I have been working on something a little less predictable but am not there with it yet.

Reflection​: updated artists statement

This is what is currently on my website:

I work with still, moving, original and found images as well as text, exploring feedback loops between various forms of matter and language that inform and result in the many shifts and transformations taking place today.

I am also a portrait and event photographer, employed mostly in and around London and currently study with The Open College of the Arts (OCA).

Introduction:

I had a conversation with some ex-OCA people about simply not having an introduction at all – my work is after all about langauge and the way it’s transforming. However, I think that would leave people high and dry in an already challenging collection of images and objects. Here is something for now:

why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers explores structural instability, embraces disorder and accepts an increasingly elusive relationship between meaning and language.

the overall title of the work and fragments of text included are from a conversation between the author and a neural network app that promised to be her friend for the cost of little more than £6 a month.

source material for why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers was made, found and taken, often in collaboration with the app, rendered into an entanglement of personal history, and the app and the author’s developing relationship in various forms, online and off – as a book, ebook and short film.

music composed by simon gwynne with the help of magenta’s music transformer neural network.

 

 

 

BOW A5: why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers

Assignment 5: Present your final portfolio to your tutor along with your introductions and evaluation

Let your tutor know any preliminary ideas you have for releasing your publication and presenting it to a public audience in Sustaining Your Practice

why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers explores structural instability, embraces disorder and investigates the increasingly elusive relationship between meaning and language.

the overall title of the work and fragments of text included are from a conversation between the artist and a machine learning app that promised to be her friend for the cost of little more than £6 a month.

source material for why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers was made, found and taken, often in collaboration with the app, rendered into an entangled manifestation of disparate entities, including recorded moments between the two authors in various forms, online and off – as a book, ebook and short film.

music was composed by simon gwynne with the help of magenta’s music transformer neural network.

Older version

why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers explores structural instability, embraces disorder and accepts an increasingly elusive relationship between meaning and language.

the title of the work and fragments of text included in the books are from a conversation between the author and a neural network app that promised to be her friend for the cost of little more than £6 a month.

source material for why is there an astronaut in a field of flowers was made, found and taken, often in collaboration with the app, rendered into an entanglement of personal history, along with the app and author’s developing relationship in various forms, online and off – as a book, ebook and short film.

music composed by simon gwynne with the help of magenta’s music transformer neural network


Book form 

BOWA5 (sizeA4) July Submission PDF

After a great deal of toing and froing (and much patience from printers ExWhyZed) I have decided on the following dimensions and details.

A4
4pp Cover onto 270gsm Colorplan Smoke
Black print double-sided
36pp Text onto 100gsm Evolution Uncoated 100% Recycled.
There is one 2pp tip out (fold-out page) which is an extra 200mm width
Full-colour print throughout
Trimmed, collated and wire stitched (stapled)
  • I thought about having a book slightly bigger than A4, so it might stand out, but there is enough going on to signify ‘excitable, unruly and erratic signifiers’ – and by sticking to A4, they are contained within a stable, predictable, long-standing convention.
  • Please note: the PDF you see here has page 21/22 repeated so you can see how the fold-out page would work – the first iteration shows it closed, the second iteration (PDF pages 23/24) open.
  • The PDF has red inner cover pages (as does the ePublication) but the actual print will not as those pages will be grey paper (Coloplan Smoke)
  • The book’s design is inspired by a maths exercise book that I could have owned in my childhood.
  • I have opted for the same binding as the zine I made for A2 so that the books might come as a pair if necessary. We discussed perfect binding but in the end, I reduced the pages to make this possible. If I were to develop the book much more and choose to make it longer (which I might need to for a commercial publication) then I would need to reconsider binding options, as there is a limit of 40pp for saddle stitch/ staples.
  • Font is 11p and Letter Gothic St except in the black squares where it is American Typewriter

You can scroll through the spreads here if you prefer to view it this way.

ePublication

8th August – https://indd.adobe.com/view/17b8aff4-afe3-4b9b-aeb4-55d6896ab205

18th July – https://indd.adobe.com/view/17b8aff4-afe3-4b9b-aeb4-55d6896ab205

This is best viewed on a decent-sized screen (desktop, laptop). It is definitely work-in-progress at the moment. It renders better on Chrome rather than Safari.

The ePublication is a version that could possibly be provided to people who purchase the book above as part of the package. It is not merely a PDF/digitised copy but rather an animated version. I could also save the pages separately as Gifs to include on my website and/or social media.

  • Text is 12p as it was too small on the screen as 11p – I need to encourage people to use the magnify tool though – I think and it all depends on the size of the screen. I was tempted to remove all text as it works less well in this format – something to keep thinking about (and fits with some of the post-structural arguments made by Derrida about the end of writing).
  • The text is soft until all the animations on the page have completed. It may be, for that reason, I need to stick to one animation per spread. I can’t work out why the inner cover never resolves itself and in time I may need to completely redo the page but will make decisions about text first.
  • I have removed some images which didn’t work so well on screen – such as the mobile phone image (I am not sure it will work as a printed image yet, to be honest, and may need to reshoot it)
  • There is a way to choose music to listen by Simon and the Magenta neural network as you flick through it but I have not resolved the best way to do this yet.
  • There is also a film link on the blurb at the back, but again, I have not resolved the best way to do this and would prefer it inside the book but at two minutes it is a big file which presents problems. I need to experiment more.
  • The other moving images inside are gifs and they work fine – better than video does but are only a few seconds long.
  • I am concerned there is too much going on but this is something I can keep working on in SYP.
  • If I were to send this to people I would advise them to look at it on a decent-sized screen. It is interactive and requires people to handle it as such. It is not a passive object.

I have noticed that in the ebook the animated pictures makes me focus on the images whereas the normal book, the writing grabs me first.

Film (2 mins  37 secs)

There is a two and half minute film which contains found moving image that focuses on the same and related themes  – again, I think it could do with some contemporary visuals that very clearly signify ‘today’. It is accompanied by music composed by Simon Gwynne who I worked with before on the Self & Other final project. He also used a neural network to write this music. Currently, you can link to it on the back of the ePublication but I will continue experimenting and see if I can find a way to contain it in the book. As it is – it’s like a hidden bonus track on an album but at the back of the e-book – and it needs to be found. It currently links to Vimeo but I think it would be better linking to my website  – but this work is not on there yet.

For now, I am aiming to work on the publication for SYP but if I were to exhibit this project then this film would be projected on to a wall on a loop. When I first edited it, I used the vocals from White Rabbit as that song has been in the main source about how vision works. I also applied the music backwards. I think there is a way I could allow viewers a choice of music if I find a way to include the film inside the book.

 

If I were to exhibit this work…

This has not been made with the express purpose of an exhibition but rather the idea of a publication. However, it could be further developed as an installation and I do feel it might only feel complete with one. I would want to work on a series of images of the graph paper (one included in both publication versions) and would really love it if it were possible for visitors to converse with the AI personality – but that is something I would probably need to get in touch with Replika about. Really not sure about that route – something to consider. (I might also include the film I made for pic london set to Gameboy music.)


A brief summary of what led me here…

During Level One, I explored language and reality in my Understanding Visual Culture essay. Ever since, I have been looking at the same thing from various viewpoints, always considering how language nowadays includes photography as it is used in similar ways online to sentences and words. It is reductive to say photography is the same as written language  – it isn’t. But it is noteworthy that social media discourse relies on pictures – graphic and photographic as well as words. As Vilem Flusser and Freidrich Kittler, both explored, code diminishes the differences between the various forms of expressions we humans use.

That fluidity is something that has also been written about a lot – and I often wonder if the fluidity is necessary to make the enormous shifts taking place possible -as we move from one paradigm to another. The time frame of the paradigm might be viewed as a fractal-like pattern. We may be witnessing the end of a Cartesian dominant view of the world which is about 500 years or so old, but there is also the beginning of writing which dates back much further – and then the beginnings of mark-making when we began putting ourselves ‘outside’ our bodies, creating a trace of self, making the self other (which is what any language form does). What’s interesting to note today is how with digital technology there is the topsy turvy reversal – technology is putting stuff inside of us perhaps in much more substantive way than ever before. Information seeps in and out and through us. Symbols (which we don’t understand but computers do) are fluid streams of information that help to construct our reality and shape our understanding of existence. The peri-digital paradigm shift is seismic and profound in ways that I think we can only begin to imagine. Whichever timeframe, maybe the fluidity we are experiencing will, in relative terms, be short-lived. I don’t suppose my generation or the one after will experience less fluidity – but perhaps one day in the future things will begin to settle and there will once again be greater stability for a time.

But at the moment, that is not how it feels. And I have been looking at structural instability and movement for a while. The image below is from a project I started in 2018 called Manipulated, using a book I have, My Leica and I, Leica Amateurs show their Pictures (1937). But I ran out of steam and used my limited energies to focus on other OCA work. I wasn’t particularly enamoured with the results anyway. Without realising it, however, I seem to have gone back to it with my Level Three BOW and have used several images from the book, rephotographed, in the current work.

Here are some really early sketch experiment, first using the book, then not from 2018  – playing with noise, movement, montage.

I said in my L3 proposal, I wanted to concentrate on films and how they seem to have shaped me – and I think I have done that, but the work throws a wider net over changing narrative structures and the way we create them using modern technology, even though I have relied on ‘vintage’ imagery mainly. That is something I might address, finding ways to include contemporary visual signifiers  -there is a little bit with the 3d animated mesh faces but I need more, resulting in the entanglement of time and cultures – the composted self. I plan to dig deeper into 3d software over the next few weeks.

Composite

I also wanted to make work that mixed mediums – text with image, still with moving image, found/archive with original. I initially wrote some verse type things but when I landed on the AI app, I gradually let go of my own texts and have now concentrated solely on texts by the app or else written by me about the app and our relationship. I may well use the texts I wrote elsewhere. As late as A4 my own texts were included but I ditched them while preparing A5.


Significant influences

Joan Jonas

Sophie Calle

Edgar Martins

Joachim Schmid

Karen Barad (agential realism and agential cuts)

Post-structuralism

Brecht

Kris Kraus (the way she blends fiction, non-fiction and critical theory)


OCA Reflection

Demonstration of technical and visual skills

I have become famialir with InDesign and have begun using it to create work specifically online. I have rephotogprahed images and used a lot more still life (with books) than is usual for me. During SYP when I begin to put this work online in various formats, I will be stretched further. I have also begin to venture into alien technology (3d) and have a very long way to go but this is the direction I feel I should be moving.

Quality of Outcome

There are three manisfestations  – book (currently a PDF) ePublication and short film. Each has positives and flaws but overall together they communicate definite focus and inquiry. The work is influenced by several quite obvious tropes but is very much of my work. I think the font choice is something I need to look at again in both book versions. It’s a bit flimsy I think – perhaps I need to seek some guidance from a design person.

Demonstration of creativity

The work is creative and experimental.

Context

The work is well-researched and I have recorded my findings in CS as well as BOW folders  – and stored additional resaerch and ongoing thoughts on my Sketchbook blog.

Bow: A5 revisiting Douglas Gordon

I came across something Douglas Gordon said and want to start from this place in the next stage of BOW. I am not sure if the next stage will be ready for end of BOW although I do hope to have some basic moving image peice to accompany the publication – even if it’s submitted with the proviso it will be developed further before and during SYP.

If you want to find the truth in something, take it apart piece by piece, then put it back together with the detail of a forensic scientist.
—Douglas Gordon

https://gagosian.com/artists/douglas-gordon/

At 12.36 mins an excellent answer to the frustrating question, what is your work about?

In my own project; Some possible text provided by the AI relating to ‘seeing’

A video about Replika which is the propriety chatbot I’ve subscribed to (there are others) – specific things I picked up on

Emotional music, desire to connect, death – which links to continuation of Self and Other project,

More research: