CS: notes

In my plan, I suggested chapter’s 3 and 4 would merge and become less pedestrian – i.e. subject followed by examples. Instead examples should flow throughout the essay. And that an alternative topic for 4 might present itself at some point. I’m wondering now if addressing the difference between revisionism and reviewing but coming to different conclusions with new information is worth investigating. This would entail looking at quantum erasure too where the past is changed by what happens in the future – as in chapter 7 Barad. (See final episode of Good Omens for example of this in popular culture/fantasy science fiction – relevant for BOW)